Thursday, May 20, 2010

New Article in Law and Development Review

A critical view on TRIPs, Patents and Medical Access...

M., Gopakumar K. (2010) "Product Patents and Access to Medicines in India: A Critical Review of the Implementation of TRIPS Patent Regime," The Law and Development Review: Vol. 3 : No. 2, Article 11.

In 2005, India amended its Patents Act, 1970 to introduce TRIPS compliant product patent regime. Generally speaking, law and policy makers in India during the time of the amendment were confronted with two major concerns viz. the future of the Indian pharmaceutical industry and access to affordable medicines in India and other developing countries. To address these concerns India along with many other developing countries attempted to incorporate TRIPS flexibilities in their domestic law. However, the success of the TRIPS flexibilities in addressing the question of access to affordable medicines mainly depends on three factors: a) the incorporation of flexibilities in the domestic law; b) the manufacturing capability of a country; and c) the political will to use the public interest safeguards provided in the domestic law. There are only a few countries like India, which satisfy the above-mentioned conditions to a certain extent. This article examines whether these premises hold true after five years into the implementation of the TRIPS compliant patent system in India. In this context the paper identifies and analyzes the legal, policy and institutional challenges that India is currently facing in the implementation of TRIPS flexibilities. It also identifies the main legal, policy and institutional disconnect in the implementation of TRIPS flexibilities in India. It argues that to effectively use TRIPS flexibilities to address access to affordable medicines require changes in three areas viz. law, policy and institutions. It clearly shows that mere incorporation of TRIPS flexibilities in the domestic legislation alone is not enough and the domestic legislation needs to be complemented with policy and institutional framework.

www.bepress.com/ldr/vol3/iss2/art11/

Sunday, May 9, 2010

Law and Development Review: Spexial Issue - New Voices from Emerging Powers - Brazil and India

This symposium looks interesting. I write looks because I am still grading finals so I do not have time to read it yet.

Law and Development review
Volume 3, Number 2 (2010)
Special Issue (2010): New Voices from Emerging Powers - Brazil and India

Introduction3
Bhupinder Chimni and David Trubek

PDF4
Linking Promises to Policies: Law and Development in an Unequal Brazil5
Diogo R. Coutinho

PDF6
The Persistence of Formalism: Towards a Situated Critique beyond the Classic Separation of Powers7
Jose R. Rodriguez

PDF8
Development Bank, Law and Innovation Financing in a New Brazilian Economy9
Mario Schapiro

PDF10
John Rawls' Justice as Fairness and the WTO: A Critical Analysis on the Initial Position of the Multilateral Agricultural Negotiation11
Rafael Rosa Cedro and Bruno Furtado Vieira

PDF12
Turning Trips on Its Head: An "IP Cross Retaliation" Model for Developing Countries13
Shamnad Basheer

PDF14
Exceptions and Limitations in Indian Copyright Law for Education: An Assessment15
Lawrence Liang

PDF16
The Indian Competition Act: A Historical and Developmental Perspective17
Shiju Varghese Mazhuvanchery

PDF18
Transit and Trade Barriers in South Asia: Multilateral Obligations and Development Perspective19
Prabir De

PDF20
Stock Market and Shareholder Protection: Are They Important for Economic Growth?21
Francis Xavier Rathinam and A. V. Raja

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Designing Antitrust Agencies for More Effective Outcomes: What Antitrust Can Learn From Restaurant Guides

I have a new essay in which I propose a user guide to measure effectiveness of regulatory agencies. The essay is Designing Antitrust Agencies for More Effective Outcomes: What Antitrust Can Learn From Restaurant Guides.

Antitrust policy should be concerned with the quality and effectiveness of the antitrust system. Some efforts at agency effectiveness include self-study of antitrust agencies to determine the factors that lead to improving agency quality. Such studies, however, often focus only on enforcement decisions and other agency initiatives such as competition advocacy. They do not reflect at least one other part of the equation: what do non-government users of the antitrust system think about the quality of antitrust agencies? This Symposium Essay advocates the use of a ratings guide by antitrust practitioners for antitrust agencies to add to the tools in which to measure agency effectiveness for both mature and emerging antitrust agencies.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Who Bribes in Public Contracting and Why: Worldwide Evidence from Firms

This new article has some really interesting findings. Download it while it is hot.

Who Bribes in Public Contracting and Why: Worldwide Evidence from Firms

Utilizing data from an enterprise survey of over 11,000 firms operating in 125 countries, and building on a profit maximizing cost-benefit framework driving a firm’s bribery decision, we study the determinants of bribery in public procurement contracting. The data suggest that about one-third of firms bribe in order to secure public contracts, and that these firms pay an average of 7.9% of the contract value in bribes. The likelihood of bribing is higher in low income countries (50%), yet in industrialized OECD countries bribery does take place among a substantial minority (14%) of firms.

Econometric estimations suggest that the demand side of good governance (voice and democratic accountability, press freedom, transparency) and the supply-side (rule of law, government effectiveness), along with competition, reduce both the incidence and magnitude (fee) of procurement bribery by the firm. Multinational firms appear to partially adapt to their host country governance environment, bribing more often in medium- and low-income countries (at 20%) than in OECD countries (at 11%). Yet multinationals do not fully ‘adapt’ and thus do not behave exactly like the domestic firms in the host country (at 36%); transnational firms appear more sensitive to reputational costs in their home country and internationally as well.

Firms that are larger and foreign-owned are less likely to bribe than smaller domestic firms, yet among bribers, foreign and domestic firms pay similar bribe fees. This suggests that reputational risks - which weigh on the decision to bribe, not on the amount - play an important role. The results are consistent with the firm’s profit-maximizing framework and have implications for policy, namely in efforts to raise the cost and lower the benefits of bribing (e.g. detection and public disclosure of firms that bribe). The results also cast doubt on conventional initiatives that do not affect the profit function (such as voluntary codes of conduct).

Laws Locations: The Textures of Legality in Developing and Transitional Societies

Laws Locations: The Textures of Legality in Developing and Transitional Societies
April 23-25, 2010, UW Law School

The Conference titled "Laws Locations: The Textures of Legality in Developing and Transitional Societies" will be held at the University of Wisconsin Law School on April 23-25, 2010. The conference is held in conjunction with the annual symposium of the Wisconsin International Law Journal. It is part of the Research Circle on Role of Law in Developing and Transition Countries.

The conference is held in honor of Professor David Trubek, Voss Bascom Emeritus Professor of Law and Senior Fellow, Center for World Affairs and the Global Economy (WAGE).


Guest speaker:


Professor Richard Abel, Michael J Connell Professor of Law, University of California Los Angeles Law School will deliver "Personal Reminiscences of David Trubek."


Conference theme

Agenda


Speaker bios

Abstracts

Papers

Flavia Agnes


Cathi Albertyn


Helena Alviar

Joe Conti


Allison Christians

Javier Couso


Diogo Coutinho


Jackie Dugard

David Engel

Mary Gallagher


Manuel Gomez


Mario Gomez

Diana Kapiszewski

Jonathan Klaaren

Lisa Laplante

Lauren McCarthy


Sally Merry

Shunko Rojas


Alvaro Santos


Greg Shaffer

Mario Schapiro

Druscilla Scribner

Mauricio Villegas

Saturday, April 3, 2010

LLSV Revisited Symposium in the BYU Law Review

Volume 2009, no. 6

Articles
“Law and Finance”: Inaccurate, Incomplete, and Important
Ruth V. Aguilera and Cynthia A. Williams

Law and Financial Development: What We Are Learning from Time-Series Evidence
John Armour, Simon Deakin, Viviana Mollica, and Mathias Siems

Legal Regimes and Political Particularism: An Assessment of the “Legal Families” Theory from the Perspectives of Comparative Law and Political Economy
John W. Cioffi

Unpacking Adaptability
Andreas Engert and D. Gordon Smith

The Legal Origins Theory in Crisis
Lisa M. Fairfax

Legal Origins and the Tasks of Corporate Law in Economic Development: A Preliminary Exploration
John Ohnesorge

A "Law & Personal Finance" View of Legal Origins Theory
Karl S. Okamoto

Rethinking the "Law and Finance" Paradigm
Katharina Pistor

Legal Origins, Investor Protection, and Canada
Poonam Puri

Mixing-and-Matching Across (Legal) Family Lines
J. Mark Ramseyer

Competition Policy and Comparative Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises
D. Daniel Sokol

Contemporary Legal Transplants: Legal Families and the Diffusion of (Corporate) Law
Holger Spamann

Legal Origins, Functionalism, and the Future of Comparative Law
Christopher A. Whytock

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Technology Entrepreneurship and Management Conference and Call for Papers

The Brown International Advanced Research Institutes (BIARI) ambitious new program is designed to provide a valuable professional development opportunity for young faculty in the early stages of their research and teaching careers.

From June 13th - June 26th 2010, we will convene 30-40 emerging scholars at an Institute on
Technology Entrepreneurship and Management at Brown University in the United States.

This Institute will provide a forum for presenting and discussing research on a broad range of current themes in entrepreneurship studies and related disciplines. Perspectives will include, but are by no means limited to: development economics, organizational and economic sociology, management theory, and technology studies. The program will devote particular attention to similarities and differences between entrepreneurship in the ‘Global North’ and ‘Global South’; however, work with a purely Southern or purely Northern focus is also welcome, especially if the researcher is receptive to cross-national comparisons.

Instructors and keynote speakers at the Institute will be a mix of Brown faculty and leading scholars from institutions around the world. Further details about the Institute can be found here.

Technology Entrepreneurship and Management is one of four Institutes being held in June 2010. To learn more about the BIARI initiative and the application process. please visit our website at: http://brown.edu/BIARI

The Brown International Advanced Research Institutes program has been generously funded by Brown University and Santander Universities. Successful applicants will receive travel assistance, be hosted in University residential housing and be provided catered meals. During
the Institute, participants will have access to Brown University's world class research facilities. Please send questions and comments to BIARI@brown.edu.